Week 5: Trade-Offs and Tough Choices: Leading Through Financial Crossroads
- Terrell A Turner
- Jul 2
- 6 min read
Updated: Sep 25
By Terrell A. Turner, CPA
Why This Topic Matters
Running a law firm means constantly facing decisions that are hard, not just complex. These are the situations where there’s no clear right or wrong—just varying levels of risk, reward, and sacrifice. You might want to give raises, take on meaningful pro bono work, or grow your team—but the financials may not support it.
At these crossroads, leaders are tested. You can’t always say “yes” to everything. The key is to lead with clarity, even when resources are limited and emotions are high. That’s what this week is all about—developing the muscle to lead through financial tension with wisdom, courage, and structure.
The 3 Wishes Example: We All Want Everything
If a genie offered you three wishes for your firm, you'd probably ask for more money, more time, and more qualified team members. But real-world law firm leadership doesn’t come with magical solutions. Instead, it comes with competing priorities that force trade-offs.
More staff might reduce workload, but stretch your margins thin.
Raising salaries may boost morale but could derail your profit goals.
Taking on passion projects might reinforce your brand but delay revenue-generating work.
The lesson here is simple but profound: you can’t scale everything at once. Each decision impacts another. Great leaders accept this truth and learn to lead through it by using data, frameworks, and intentional communication—not guesswork or guilt.
Foundational Principles for Making Hard Decisions
Before applying any decision-making framework, let’s ground ourselves in three key principles that high-performing law firm leaders consistently embrace:
1. Not Every Decision Has a “Winner”
There are times when every available option carries a downside—a cost, a trade-off, or a level of risk. Trying to find a perfect solution only delays decision-making. Instead, great leaders shift the question from “What’s the best choice?” to “What’s the wisest choice based on what we know today?”
This approach encourages realistic planning, embraces uncertainty, and keeps the firm moving forward—even in imperfect circumstances.
2. Emotions Are Real—And Must Be Acknowledged
Emotions are not a liability—they’re part of the leadership equation. When you’re discussing raises, hiring freezes, or limiting workload, people will react. It’s human. Acknowledge those emotions—your team’s and your own.
Rather than suppressing emotion, lead with empathy. Say things like, “I know this decision feels frustrating. Let’s walk through the facts together and look at what’s possible in the current season.” This makes you trustworthy—even when the outcome isn’t what people hoped for.
3. Present a Clear Picture—Even If It’s Not What People Want to See
You’re not always expected to have the answer—but you are expected to create clarity. That means laying out the available options, showing the trade-offs in simple terms, and facilitating decision-making rooted in truth.
Clarity builds trust, even when the result is disappointing. Avoiding transparency erodes credibility fast.
The TLTurner 5-Step Decision-Making Framework
When you're stuck at a financial crossroads, this five-step process helps you lead with structure and confidence:
1. Understand
Start by clarifying the core question. Is this about growth, compensation, retention, sustainability, or capacity? Define exactly what decision needs to be made—and what success would look like.
Example: “We need to decide whether to hire a full-time paralegal or outsource support to a freelancer.”
2. Identify Factors
List out every variable—financial and non-financial—that’s influencing the choice. These may include cash flow, staff morale, client deadlines, reputation, compliance, team energy, or leadership alignment.
Example: “If we hire in-house, we’ll need more office space. If we outsource, we’ll lose control over communication flow.”
3. Calculate
Run basic scenarios. Compare projected costs, revenue shifts, team productivity, and risk exposure. Don’t try to be perfect—get directional clarity.
Example: “Hiring full-time will cost $6,500/month with benefits, but increase throughput by 25%. Outsourcing costs $3,000/month with more limitations.”
4. Summarize
Lay out the pros and cons in plain language. What do we gain or risk in each option? Keep it visual if needed (e.g., table format). Present it so that everyone involved can engage constructively.
Example: “Option A improves productivity but lowers cash buffer. Option B is cheaper, but adds communication risk and caps our growth.”
5. Recommend
Don’t just dump data—offer a thoughtful point of view. Based on the facts and context, what do you suggest? Or, if it’s a collaborative call, present your analysis clearly and invite feedback.
Leadership Tip: Frame your recommendation with humility. “Here’s what I’d suggest based on what we know—let’s sense-check it together.”
Real-World Trade-Off Scenarios: Expanded and Detailed
Let’s apply the framework above to five real-life law firm dilemmas—each designed to reflect the kind of complex, high-stakes decisions leaders face every quarter.
Scenario 1: Who Should We Hire First—Attorney or Paralegal?
The Situation: You’re stretched thin and have the budget to hire one role. Do you bring in a new attorney to increase revenue directly—or a paralegal to improve case processing and support?
What to Evaluate:
Revenue Generation vs. Operational Efficiency: Attorneys bill directly. Paralegals enable attorneys to do more with less time.
Cost of Each Role: Attorneys often cost twice as much. Does your forecast support that commitment?
Bottleneck Identification: If your team is closing too few cases, you likely need a paralegal. If you’re turning away work, an attorney may be the better hire.
Time to Impact: Paralegals may start contributing ROI in 30 days. Attorneys might need 60–90 days to onboard, train, and start billing.
Leadership Insight: Run a mini ROI forecast for each option. Then factor in strategic fit: Which role helps you unlock your next level of growth?
Scenario 2: A Partner Wants to Hire, But Others Are Concerned About Margins
The Situation: One partner sees growth opportunity and wants to hire two new support staff. Other partners are nervous about shrinking profits and slower cash flow.
What to Evaluate:
Current Operating Margin: Are you operating above your 15–20% net income target? If not, any new hire will reduce distributions.
Revenue per Hire: Estimate how much new revenue each hire could help generate—directly or indirectly.
Draw Impact: Model what partner distributions will look like with and without the hire. Share dollar amounts—not just percentages.
Cash Flow Cushion: Can the firm float 60–90 days of salary before ROI kicks in?
Leadership Insight: Data changes the conversation. When partners see the downstream impact on distributions, the debate becomes more strategic and less emotional.
Scenario 3: Should We Take On More Pro Bono Work?
The Situation: You’ve been offered a compelling opportunity to expand your pro bono efforts. The work aligns with your firm’s mission—but your capacity is limited.
What to Evaluate:
Utilization and Burnout Risk: Are your attorneys already at or above 85% utilization? If so, something will have to give.
Opportunity Cost: What billable work might be displaced? Estimate revenue loss if caseload shifts.
Long-Term Value: Does this work enhance your reputation, referral sources, or community relationships? What’s the intangible ROI?
Team Morale: Will this fuel passion and loyalty—or add stress?
Leadership Insight: Sometimes it’s not a financial decision—it’s a cultural one. But culture still requires a budget. Build a cap or timeline around pro bono to protect your margins.
Scenario 4: Staff Members Want Raises, But Revenue Is Flat
The Situation: Several team members have requested raises. You value them—but your revenue has not increased, and margins are already tight.
What to Evaluate:
Market Compensation Benchmarks: Are your staff paid below, at, or above industry averages?
Revenue per Employee: Is their compensation aligned with the revenue they help generate or support?
Productivity Metrics: Can you tie raise eligibility to specific output goals—like billable hours, cases closed, or leads converted?
Phased Raises: Could you offer an immediate partial increase, with a performance-based incentive structure for the rest?
Leadership Insight: Transparency is everything. Explain the economics, show your intent to reward value, and tie raises to metrics. Fairness isn’t always equal pay—it’s clear expectations.
Scenario 5: A/R Is Climbing and Cash Is Shrinking
The Situation: You’re billing clients regularly, but cash is getting tight. Your A/R is growing—and it’s starting to restrict firm operations.
What to Evaluate:
A/R Aging: What % of invoices are over 30, 60, and 90 days overdue? Are a few clients responsible for the bulk of the issue?
Last Client Touchpoint: When was the last collection follow-up? Was it automated or personal?
Work in Progress (WIP): Are you continuing to work for clients who haven’t paid their last invoice?
Partner Involvement: Would a personal call from a lead attorney accelerate collections?
Leadership Insight: Delaying tough A/R decisions creates compound problems. You might have to freeze work or introduce retainers for slow-paying clients. It’s uncomfortable—but protecting your firm’s financial health is part of protecting your team.
Reading Assignments
Final Thoughts: Leadership Isn’t About Easy Decisions—It’s About Clarity in the Hard Ones
The moments that shape your leadership aren’t the easy wins. They’re the tough calls—when cash is tight, emotions are high, and the team is looking to you for clarity.
In those moments, your job is to bring:
Perspective – What are we solving for? What matters most?
Process – How can we analyze this with integrity and structure?
Pragmatism – What’s sustainable, not just feel-good?
This Week’s Action Plan:
Choose a current or upcoming financial crossroads in your firm.
Apply the 5-Step Framework: Understand, Identify, Calculate, Summarize, Recommend.
Share your process with your leadership team to build trust—even if you haven’t reached a final answer.
Your Power as a Leader: Help your team navigate the fog of uncertainty with structure, transparency, and courage.
Comments